Most Supply Chain Teams Really Aren’t

They Look Aligned on Paper but Pull in Different Directions

If your supply chain is not functioning like a team, it is fighting a civil war.

And most organizations are far closer to war than they want to admit.

Even if they do admit it, few understand that your supply chain consists of more than your supply chain personnel. It includes everyone involved in the six mega-processes of supply chain: PLAN, BUY, MAKE, MOVE, DISTRIBUTE and SELL.

While those six mega-processes must operate as a coordinated system, most often they operate as competing interests.

Sales pushes for volume. Operations pushes for efficiency. Procurement pushes for cost. Finance pushes for margin. Each function optimizes itself, and the result is friction everywhere.

You see it in missed forecasts, excess inventory, stockouts and constant expediting. You see it in meetings where people defend their numbers instead of solving problems. Quiet frustration builds as teams that should depend on each other do not trust each other.

That is a set of silos in conflict. Supply chain teams should focus on delivering goods and value, not internal battles

Most leaders try to fix this with better tools, better dashboards and more meetings.

They invest in planning systems, implement new S&OP processes and add visibility platforms. All of that matters for supply chain operations.

But none of it fixes the underlying problem if the people in the system are not aligned.

The Blind Spot Is in the Team, not the Data

When PLAN, BUY, MAKE, MOVE, DISTRIBUTE and SELL are not aligned, the organization pays what I call the blind spot tax.

Leadership believes the system is working because the metrics look acceptable. Meanwhile, the people closest to the work know it is not. They see the workarounds, the rework, the late changes and the constant firefighting required to keep things moving.

That gap between perception and reality is expensive. And it grows over time.

This is also why so many S&OP (sales and operations planning) implementations struggle. On paper, S&OP is straightforward: one plan, one set of numbers, one aligned organization. In practice, people walk into the room defending their function instead of aligning around the business.

The meeting becomes a negotiation, not a decision-making process.

You cannot make informed decisions if the players do not see themselves on the same team.

Go Beyond Improving Links

This is not a new insight.

At the start of this millennium, my book No Boundaries described how supply chains evolve. At the earliest stage, nothing works well. The organization is fragmented. Each function does its own thing.

That condition still exists in many companies.

Progress begins when the internal links start to work together – when the organization moves toward what I called link excellence. At that point, they at least have a shared plan and some level of coordination.

But even then, many companies stop too early. They improve the links without ever turning the chain into a true team.

Real progress starts when the internal supply chain behaves like a single system. Supply chain teams in PLAN, BUY, MAKE, MOVE, DISTRIBUTE and SELL move from negotiating with each other to solving for the same outcome. They share one set of priorities, understand the trade-offs and win or lose together.

Until that happens, everything else is incremental.

Your Complete Team Includes Companies that Don’t Work for You

But even companies that get this right internally often miss a bigger reality.

Your supply chain does not stop at your four walls.

Your end-to-end supply chain includes every supplier upstream and every customer downstream. It starts where raw materials enter the system and ends when the final product reaches the customer. And many of the most important players in that chain do not work for you.

Which means your supply chain “team” is not just your organization.

It is a multi-company system.

If your internal team is aligned but disconnected from your suppliers and customers, you have simply moved the friction to a different place. Now the conflict moves from functions inside your company to companies across the supply chain.

Supplier relationships fracture because they do not trust your forecasts, and you do not trust their commitments. Customers change demand without warning. Everyone protects their own position.

And once again, the system becomes reactive instead of coordinated.

This is where supply chain performance either accelerates or breaks.

Winning Companies Build Connected Supply Chain Teams

The organizations that move forward are the ones that extend team thinking beyond the enterprise. They connect their plans to their partners’ plans. They align incentives where possible. They share information in a way that improves decision-making across the network, not just inside one company.

Over time, the boundaries start to matter less. The supply chain moves beyond transactions and operates as a coordinated flow – from raw material to end customer.

That is when you start to see real performance gains: higher inventory turns, lower costs, better service levels and faster response to change.

But none of that happens without alignment.

At its core, supply chain performance is not just about systems. It’s a team sport – one that requires collaboration inside your company and across your network.

The companies that win will stop managing supply chain as a function and start leading it as a team – first within their own organization, and then across the entire end-to-end supply chain.

Everyone else will keep fighting the same civil war.

Related Reading

• 7 Ways AI and Generative AI Benefits E2E Supply Chains
• Demographic Changes Will Force Supply Chain Changes
• 2023 Insights: The Top 10 Blogs on Supply Chain Leadership